[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813128: Fwd: Bug#813128: transition: openmpi



On 02/02/16 08:34, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 01/02/2016 15:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 01/02/16 12:41, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>>
>>> The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as
>>> expected and wanted.
>>> The rest, is premature.
> 
>> The problem is that you uploaded the package directly to unstable, without
>> asking for a transition slot and without fixing those problems you mention
>> beforehand. It'd have been better to upload it to experimental until
> things were
>> ready.
> Yes. I don't know why the package ended up in unstable, as I was uploading
> to 'experimental'.

Your .changes had "Distribution: unstable". Probably because you did "sbuild -d
unstable openmpi....dsc". No idea if lintian warns about a mismatching suite in
the .changes and the changelog...

>> Since that has already happened, it'd be good to know what packages
> build fine
>> against the new openmpi and which ones don't.
> 
>> Cheers,
>> Emilio
> I'm rebuilding at the moment. Currently blacs-mpi and adios fail to
> compile against
> the new openmpi (all other level 1 work fine); this is due to 1.10 not
> shipping
> libmpi_f77 libmpi_f90 (instead shipping libmpi_mpife) which I'm working
> on fixing.

OK, I'll binNMU everything but those two in level one. Let me know once you have
fixed that problem and I'll do the other two.

Cheers,
Emilio


Reply to: