[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#771944: marked as done (Following FusionForge 5.3 stable branch)

Your message dated Fri, 1 Jan 2016 18:45:12 +0100
with message-id <20160101174512.GC31614@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#771944: Following FusionForge 5.3 stable branch
has caused the Debian Bug report #771944,
regarding Following FusionForge 5.3 stable branch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
771944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

We're (upstream-ly) maintaining a stable branch for FusionForge,
called "5.3", which the Debian package currently follows.
(incidentally Lolando and I are both upstream and debian devs)

We're currently pushing only bugfixes to this branch (some of them
qualify as "RC", some don't), because it's deployed at several large
client installs already and we want to make sure we don't break
anything.

It makes sense that users benefit from the quality of this branch, so
we'd like to know to what extent following this branch is compatible
with the Freeze.

Cheers!
Sylvain

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Dec  3, 2014 at 18:52:26 +0100, beuc@debian.org wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We're (upstream-ly) maintaining a stable branch for FusionForge,
> called "5.3", which the Debian package currently follows.
> (incidentally Lolando and I are both upstream and debian devs)
> 
> We're currently pushing only bugfixes to this branch (some of them
> qualify as "RC", some don't), because it's deployed at several large
> client installs already and we want to make sure we don't break
> anything.
> 
> It makes sense that users benefit from the quality of this branch, so
> we'd like to know to what extent following this branch is compatible
> with the Freeze.
> 
We're not used to giving blanket approval for stable updates, we'll want
to see proposed diffs before saying yes or no.  After a while of seeing
reasonable changes, we may consider giving a more general approval, but
not until then.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: