Re: Transition to SQLAlchemy 1.1.x
- To: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Cc: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>, Debian Release <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Transition to SQLAlchemy 1.1.x
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:53:19 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20161217115319.zq2flpcqcfaam5l2@betterave.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <a1cb55ed-d2e7-1b66-39b9-e5f60e9141aa@bzed.de>
- References: <ed7f8aea-aa2d-a8f9-5bae-77d38ba90954@debian.org> <20161118094554.GC19114@rene-engelhard.de> <20161118100530.uzjb6apc4zcfxosy@sar0.p1otr.com> <989d4ae6-8381-6b94-f368-d74d11e6e0b2@debian.org> <5feb6d56-a587-22eb-f5e9-4959cf16750b@debian.org> <20161121224152.ok7vot5sa3ayxmuc@sar0.p1otr.com> <aed3bd96-8f8b-37d5-26b4-2802767af544@debian.org> <a1cb55ed-d2e7-1b66-39b9-e5f60e9141aa@bzed.de>
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 21:16:46 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> sqlalchemy 1.0 is in maintenance mode only and will receive only
> critical updates, so we clearly want to have 1.1 in stretch.
>
That's not at all clear, to be honest. I do think Thomas has a point.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: