Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled
- To: YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com>
- Cc: 825342@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:58:43 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 8498ea53-9fab-0d18-1a9e-2c0f98379522@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 825342@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CAKcpw6V3KuM0KBCh_Gqt=ziv_LGQWTXy5-yjjENuCukAhGOQ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAKcpw6UG9TrkOiyMGB0tepi6F=F8vjA008iah+XwzTTzLRZnrw@mail.gmail.com> <5746CFDB.7070400@debian.org> <CAKcpw6WR8-sncx4YH5LvG3gDR3dz3peSqfynfY6GMmniDAMcRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcpw6VPvB6SwZbpLGT7rpqTHir51HwhJn4ZgL4FzPzHJraNHg@mail.gmail.com> <83370412-0ebf-a4a5-bfd2-9675d548af1a@debian.org> <CAKcpw6VZTL0vBievEM1zgFMq1XUaVVd5BSyhCnsUeee5=MABGA@mail.gmail.com> <2e52b497-b3d0-f91a-be3e-583857f0cc7c@debian.org> <CAKcpw6WcCN6X0FLZAkCcvwF1oZwsPGSQ39iwEWZxcxtScC4V2A@mail.gmail.com> <0660031b-2221-9f06-a596-7b9d70d40b95@debian.org> <e8543d29-3238-95a4-d938-8454181c71fb@debian.org> <CAKcpw6V3KuM0KBCh_Gqt=ziv_LGQWTXy5-yjjENuCukAhGOQ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 26/07/16 06:39, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>>> After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running),
>>>
>>> mips is finally catching up.
>>>
>>>> We still have these package having problem:
>>>
>>>> geoclue: give up
>>>> libhtp: give up
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by "give up". Did you see my question in the previous mail?
>>>
>>>> libc++: clang not enable FPXX by default !!!!
>>>
>>> Did you file a bug for this?
>>>
>>>> The attachment is the list --- more than 3000 packages.
>>>> Sorry for the previous wrong estimation.
>>>
>>> That list contains e.g. gtk+3.0, but that was rebuilt 8 days ago. Why is it on
>>> the list? I thought we had been building with FPXX enabled for months. I'm
>>> wondering if this 3k list is accurate or there are many false positives in there.
>>
>> Ping?
>
> Yes. It is a problem. It is due to my script detect some wrong files.
>
> While it seems that FPXX doesn't really stop our process to MIPS32r2,
> as we have some more Octeon machines.
>
> So this is out release goal, while not need binNMU now.
Any news on this?
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: