Bug#842177: transition: hdf5

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

On 05/11/16 21:37, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 843040 842815
> 
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 05/11/2016 à 17:29 :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 04/11/16 14:45, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 02/11/2016 à 19:05 :
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Good news: every hdf5 reverse dependency but 8 is now 'binnmu OK'. The
>>>> remainder is:
>>>> * shogun              FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #809290
>>>> * tessa               FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #817690
>>>> * aster               FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #837915
>>>> * deal.ii             BD uninstallable - not in testing
>>>> * odin                FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #835746
>>>> * libsis-jhdf5-java   #842815 - Very low popcon - No reverse depends
>>>>   will need some more time because part of this java wrapper library
>>>>   is now shipped with the HDF5 source tree
>>>> * yorick-hdf5         #842817 - temporary fix uploaded to experimental
>>>> * pytables            almost done - FTBFS on big endian arches
>>>>
>>>> IMO the only showstopper is now pytables, which will hopefully resolve
>>>> in the coming days.
>>>
>>> Update:
>>> * yorick-hdf5         #842817 - final fix uploaded to experimental
>>> * pytables            Affected by #843040 - Tested patch pending
>>>
>>> There isn't any blocker left but libsis-jhdf5-java which has a very low
>>> popcon and no reverse dependencies. Can we agree for a transition slot
>>> before the freeze?
>>
>> Yes, this is looking very good, so I'm acking it. But please don't upload just
>> yet, I'll give you the go in a few days when things are a bit calmer (there are
>> just too many transitions at the moment).
>>
>> And please mark any remaining bugs as blocking this one.
> 
> Done, excepted for the 'not in testing' ones. Unless you'd want these
> marked as well?

No, this is fine, thanks.

Cheers,
Emilio