Bug#838242: marked as done (transition: imagemagick)

[owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)]

Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:29:23 +0100
with message-id <e11c2762-7c96-5869-429c-1900ddce4b89@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick
has caused the Debian Bug report #838242,
regarding transition: imagemagick
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
838242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: submit@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: transition: imagemagick
• From: Bastien ROUCARIÈS <roucaries.bastien+debian@gmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:08:40 +0200
• Message-id: <2783224.3HGKWLuAUf@portable2015-bastien>

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

imagemagick waiting in NEWs (8:6.9.5.9+dfsg-1) will need a transition to 
experimental to unstable;

Next stable version need to be based on this version from a security point of 
view. It fix more than 50 securities bugs..;

Moreover this version use autopkg test improving the quality of testing.

Bastien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+debian@gmail.com>
• Cc: 838242-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick
• From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
• Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:29:23 +0100
• Message-id: <e11c2762-7c96-5869-429c-1900ddce4b89@debian.org>
• In-reply-to: <CAE2SPAawDLcLOtO3CjWWcB0V=PK4rCiejNXGCUdss4MYN7MCuQ@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <2783224.3HGKWLuAUf@portable2015-bastien> <ea6b8d02-5fc2-3dfd-4f70-081b5f71059c@debian.org> <CAE2SPAbFFFqXuhUv6EgA6Xytzr5f=spSXTMneVauvMfnWrZHJw@mail.gmail.com> <0fa6255c-ca87-13c2-85fb-4e461d3782b3@debian.org> <CAE2SPAYcRS_OVvFfmp3nkYcKJG3x0LVz9UR_cPvVKVEdFAJQ7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAE2SPAb7_UR7QE+TGUMnne5Gb_RZLOgO8Qdh9N52ArKRRun6+A@mail.gmail.com> <a56ecd0c-add1-5261-4515-55e9599bb26a@debian.org> <db925a95-9be2-7aa7-a23d-5a85c9f073f2@debian.org> <CAE2SPAawDLcLOtO3CjWWcB0V=PK4rCiejNXGCUdss4MYN7MCuQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 24/10/16 21:21, roucaries bastien wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 13/10/16 09:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 12/10/16 17:13, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>>> Uploaded new version waiting for green light
>>>
>>> Go ahead.
>>
>> Can you look at pythonmagick? That is the last blocker.
> 
> I think we should drop pythonmagick:
> 1. it is an upstream bug
> https://github.com/ImageMagick/PythonMagick/issues/5. I will fix ASAP
> when a new upstream is ready
> 2. They are three new security bugs with CVE in imagemagick.

I have removed pythonmagick from testing, which was the last package still
depending on the old imagemagick.

It can migrate back when it build against the new version.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---