Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:11:51 +0100 with message-id <1477343511.32722.49.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#655976: queue-viewer: support binary debdiffs has caused the Debian Bug report #655976, regarding queue-viewer: support binary debdiffs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 655976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655976 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: queue-viewer: support binary debdiffs
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:13:12 +0000
- Message-id: <1326643992.29770.100.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: tools It would be useful if queue-viewer could run debdiff on binary uploads, in order to catch things like missing or new files and permission changes. If anything interesting is found this could then be included in the queue output. Adam
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 655976-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#655976: queue-viewer: support binary debdiffs
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:11:51 +0100
- Message-id: <1477343511.32722.49.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1477089336.32722.10.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- References: <1326643992.29770.100.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 1476568428.19687.5.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <[🔎] 1477089336.32722.10.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 23:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2016-10-15 at 22:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > - there's no filtering of "interesting" content; all architectures for > > which there are packages have a corresponding binary debdiff link > > An initial version of support for this has been deployed. > > Currently, "Version:" fields and package dependency fields where the > changes consist purely of switching "old source version" for "new source > version" are automatically removed (with the caveat that only epochless > versions work). There's now significantly improved support, including for epochs. > As well as filtering more "boring" content, we also need some way of > indicating that no "interesting" differences were found, in a way that > queue-viewer can detect at runtime. I've added such a message to affected pages, and made queue-viewer use that to decide whether to display links to the HTML output. At this stage I think any further changes can be handled as simple patches, so I'm closing this bug. Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---