[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6



On 13/10/16 20:10, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In data martedì 11 ottobre 2016 00:14:35 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 03/10/16 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/readline7.html
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 18/09/16 20:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>> Severity: normal
>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>
>>>> readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to upload the
>>>> readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev
>>>> packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from
>>>> readline6.  Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see build
>>>> failures for unrelated reasons.  readline and readline6 can stay in testing for
>>>> some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch release.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety. The
>>>> current state of the transition can be seen at
>>>> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html
>>>
>>> Sounds good. I'd prefer to see a test rebuild on sid, but I think we could go
>>> ahead with this as it's a separate source and shouldn't block anything.
>>
>> readline 6 got decrufted. Rebuilds scheduled.
> 
> Please adjust the tracker to consider also Pre-Depends on libreadline6:
> gawk has Pre-Depends instead of Depends, and there's libreadline6 there.
> As consequence, please also schedule the binNMU of gawk for this
> transition.

Done, and scheduled.

Cheers,
Emilio


Reply to: