[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#837199: marked as done (transition: armadillo)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:34:56 +0200
with message-id <52d03de7-f2a4-daf9-8f69-4ffcc2a6f55b@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#837199: transition: armadillo
has caused the Debian Bug report #837199,
regarding transition: armadillo
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
837199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse
dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and
will test it in the next couple of days.

Thank you.

Kumar

Ben file:

title = "armadillo";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libarmadillo6" | .depends ~ "libarmadillo7";
is_good = .depends ~ "libarmadillo7";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libarmadillo6";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
Kumar Appaiah

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 14/09/16 00:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/09/16 20:12, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 09/13/2016 07:51 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>>>>> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse
>>>>> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and
>>>>> will test it in the next couple of days.
>>>>
>>>> Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unblock
>>>> the vtk6 rebuild for the openmpi transition, I've also done a round of
>>>> rebuilds to assess the impact.
>>>>
>>>> Fortunately the number of reverse dependencies for armadillo is limited,
>>>> and all packages rebuilt successfully:
>>>>
>>>>  gdal     (2.1.1+dfsg-4) OK
>>>>  gnss-sdr (0.0.8-1)      OK
>>>>  mlpack   (2.0.2-1)      OK
>>>>  seer     (1.1.1-2)      OK
>>>>
>>>>  pktools  (2.6.7-2)      OK
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to have gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) migrate to testing to get the two
>>>> RC bugfixes into stretch, before binNMUs for the armadillo rdeps are
>>>> scheduled.
>>>
>>> I scheduled everything but gdal. Let's see if gdal migrates tonight once perl is
>>> old enough.
>>
>> Thanks for waiting with the gdal binNMU, I appreciate that a lot.
>>
>> I really hope having perl migrate will be sufficient, the gdal situation
>> in testing has caused several RC bugs and a thread on -devel :-(
> 
> It just went in. I have now nmu'ed it for the armadillo transition.

This got done, closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: