Bug#834545: marked as done (transition: re2)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:32:36 +0200
with message-id <688586f4-57d0-db24-da18-6ccac65390fe@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#834545: transition: re2
has caused the Debian Bug report #834545,
regarding transition: re2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
834545: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834545
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: re2
- From: Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:44:02 -0700
- Message-id: <20160816224402.zaulrhqrrk3wpqrh@smetana.kardiogramm.net>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
It's already in experimental, where it has built on all release
architectures, so:
Ben file: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-re2.html
Only two reverse dependencies, which build on amd64. So, should be a
trivial binNMU transition.
SR
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_ZA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_ZA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
- Cc: 834545-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#834545: transition: re2
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:32:36 +0200
- Message-id: <688586f4-57d0-db24-da18-6ccac65390fe@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20160902064341.GO16876@bach.rivera.co.za>
- References: <20160816224402.zaulrhqrrk3wpqrh@smetana.kardiogramm.net> <8a5d33ae-d301-ae1f-ccd3-0164de9b2ad4@debian.org> <20160830060421.GE16876@bach.rivera.co.za> <3e20d57f-65b1-2135-1653-654076bd9393@debian.org> <20160902064341.GO16876@bach.rivera.co.za>
On 02/09/16 08:43, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Emilio (2016.08.31_00:35:21_+0200)
>>> Would you mind if I held back for the next release, due on the 1st?
>
> So, that is staged in git and ready to go.
>
> It will require a 1-line patch to ocaml-re2 (inserting an std::), and
> ruby-re2 should be binnmuable.
>
> chromium-browser, libphonenumber, and hhvm all have unrelated FTBFSs at
> the moment.
This is finished.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: