[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#827755: marked as done (transition: kdepim-16.04)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:32:05 +0200
with message-id <9f131b03-1b4d-9f11-87a7-f20fdc079cd9@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04
has caused the Debian Bug report #827755,
regarding transition: kdepim-16.04
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

827755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition


Now that the qt transition is over, we would like to start pushing kdepim to 
unstable. This should address the auto transitions:

Sadly, the last one was inadvertently started which is currently keeping some 
"cruft" packages in testing as they are still depended on, we would upload a 
+really version if this causes any problems.

The kdepimlibs binary components were all renamed in the new source package 
(kf5-kdepimlibs), so it doesn't really need to be addressed in this 
transition, but packages depending on the old kdepimlibs won't be able to use 
any of the new kdepim components, so if possible, it would be better to 
disable the dependency and remove the kdepimlibs packages.

The following ben file is intended to block all the new kdepim packages (that 
build depend on libkf5akonadi-dev, libkf5libkleo-dev and/or 
libkf5akonadiserver-dev, as well as to cover the packages affected by the 
mentioned auto-transitions. I'm sure there is a more elegant way to express 
this, but this seems to "work".

Happy hacking,

Ben file:

title = "kdepim-16.04";

is_affected = .source ~ /akonadi/
            | .build-depends ~ /libkf5akonadi-dev/
            | .build-depends ~ /libkf5akonadiserver-dev/
            | .build-depends ~ /libkf5libkleo-dev/
            | .build-depends ~ /libakonadi-dev/
            | .source ~ /kdepimlibs/
            | .build-depends ~ /kdepimlibs5-dev/
            | .source ~ /libkgapi/
            | .build-depends ~ /libkf5gapi-dev/
            | .build-depends ~ /libkgapi-dev/

is_good = .build-depends ~ /libkf5akonadi-dev/
        | .build-depends ~ /libkf5akonadiserver-dev/
        | .build-depends ~ /libkf5libkleo-dev/
        | .build-depends ~ /libkf5gapi-dev/

is_bad = .build-depends ~ /libakonadi-dev/
       | .build-depends ~ /kdepimlibs5-dev/
       | .build-depends ~ /libkgapi-dev/
       | .depends ~ /\b(akonadi\-dbg|libakonadi\-dev|libakonadiprotocolinternals1)\b/
       | .depends ~ /\b(libkgapi2\-2)\b/
       | .depends ~ /\b(libkolab0v5)\b/
       | .depends ~ /\b(kdepimlibs\-dbg|kdepimlibs5\-dev|libakonadi\-calendar4|libakonadi\-contact4|libakonadi\-kabc4|libakonadi\-kcal4|libakonadi\-kde4|libakonadi\-kmime4|libakonadi\-notes4|libakonadi\-socialutils4|libakonadi\-xml4|libgpgme\+\+2v5|libkabc4|libkalarmcal2|libkblog4|libkcal4|libkcalcore4|libkcalutils4|libkholidays4|libkimap4|libkldap4|libkmbox4|libkmime4|libkontactinterface4a|libkpimidentities4|libkpimtextedit4|libkpimutils4|libkresources4|libktnef4|libkxmlrpcclient4|libmailtransport4|libmicroblog4|libqgpgme1|libsyndication4)\b/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 25/07/16 13:33, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> ¡Hola Emilio!
> El 2016-07-25 a las 12:19 +0200, Maximiliano Curia escribió:
>> ¡Hola Emilio!
>> El 2016-07-13 a las 16:17 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió:
>>> Just let me know when things are ready to migrate and I will lift the block.
>> I think that every kdepim 16.04 package is ready to migrate to testing, some
>> of the issues have been addressed, and delaying the transition even further
>> will not have any positive effect. Thus, can you please lift the blocks so
>> that the complete set of packages enter into testing?
> Sorry, we are going to push some extra patches to fix #814762. Sorry for the noise.

This got done a while ago. Closing.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: