[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#838625: marked as done (transition: ros-ros-comm)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:17:22 +0200
with message-id <9b8e87a9-58a7-3a40-5334-3990b4b58cf6@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#838625: transition: ros-robot-model
has caused the Debian Bug report #838625,
regarding transition: ros-ros-comm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

838625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838625
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition


librosbag got a small ABI change I would like to do a transition for.

Cheers Jochen

Ben file:

title = "ros-robot-model";
is_affected = .depends ~ "librosbag1d" | .depends ~ "librosbag2d";
is_good = .depends ~ "librosbag2d";
is_bad = .depends ~ "librosbag1d";

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 23/09/16 10:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 transition: ros-ros-comm
> On 23/09/16 09:21, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>> retitle -1 transition: ros-ros-comm
>> sorry, I accidentally wrote the wrong package name. Hope it's still ok.
> Yes.

This got done, closing.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: