[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#834955: marked as done (transition: x265)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:12:38 +0200
with message-id <831b4628-8e47-13a6-8238-5c461e288b8a@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#834955: transition: x265
has caused the Debian Bug report #834955,
regarding transition: x265
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
834955: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834955
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html

x265 bumped its SONAME again and needs a transition. The new version is staged
in experimental and all reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.

Please let me know when it's okay to start the transition.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 08/10/16 12:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/10/16 23:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> That needs a binNMU in experimental, too:
>>
>> nmu gst-plugins-bad1.0_1.9.90-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libx265-95."
> 
> Scheduled.

You picked up the wrong bug ;)

This transition is long done. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: