[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#831810: marked as done (transition: libmicrohttpd)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:10:50 +0200
with message-id <efa33cea-485f-6552-d26d-007109ffa74f@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#831810: transition: libmicrohttpd
has caused the Debian Bug report #831810,
regarding transition: libmicrohttpd
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
831810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831810
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

Please allow the transition from libmicrohttpd10 to libmicrohttpd12. libmicrohttpd12 (0.9.50-1) is currently in experimental. The auto tracker 
seems correct [1].
With this new version libmicrospdy goes away (dead upstream, no r-deps), so does the libssl-dev build-dependency. This could avoid some conflicts with the openssl transition.

Among the reverse build-dependencies I was able to build:
- gnunet
- libjson-rpc-cpp
- opensips
- psensor
- yubikey-server-c
- bfgminer

Since I use a quite old laptop, I had difficulties to build (both with libmicrohttpd10 and libmicrohttp12):
- systemd
- kodi
- ola (sid only)
- pcp
- varnish-agent (sid only)
Do you know if I could have access to a testing build infrastructure ?

pcp has a RC bug, but it is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-03.
kodi has also a RC bug, but it is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-13.

Last things: please note that I do not have uploads rights yet, but it should only be a matter of time [2], and that I will not have internet access between July, 23 and August, 7.

Best regards,
Bertrand Marc

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libmicrohttpd.html
[2] https://nm.debian.org/public/process/bmarc

Ben file:

title = "libmicrohttpd";
is_affected = .depends ~ /(libmicrohttpd\-dbg|libmicrohttpd10|libmicrospdy\-dbg|libmicrospdy\-dev|libmicrospdy0)/ | .depends ~ /libmicrohttpd12/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libmicrohttpd12/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /(libmicrohttpd\-dbg|libmicrohttpd10|libmicrospdy\-dbg|libmicrospdy\-dev|libmicrospdy0)/;


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 25/07/16 00:21, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2016-07-23 20:30, Bertrand Marc wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le 23/07/2016 à 11:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> On 23/07/16 11:35, Bertrand Marc wrote:
>>>> Do you think we could allow the libmicrohttpd transition ?
>>>
>>> Yes. Go ahead.
>>
>> Thanks ! I uploaded a new revision targeting unstable to
>> mentors [1] and I asked Holger Levsen (CC), my regular sponsor, to
>> upload it to unstable.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bertrand
>>
>> [1]
>> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libm/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd_0.9.50-2.dsc
>>
> 
> Rebuilds scheduled.

This is long done. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: