[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#839916: marked as done (nmu: bmusb_0.5.2-2)



Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2016 12:51:06 +0200
with message-id <bc862b35-0107-6939-55f2-6db6645dd539@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#839916: nmu: bmusb_0.5.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #839916,
regarding nmu: bmusb_0.5.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
839916: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839916
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu bmusb_0.5.2-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."

Maintainer uploaded binaries were built against libusb from
experimental.


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 06/10/16 12:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu bmusb_0.5.2-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."
> 
> Maintainer uploaded binaries were built against libusb from
> experimental.

Scheduled.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: