[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#830200: transition: perl



On 23/09/16 11:40, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> Hi Dom!
>>>
>>> On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>>>>> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
>>>>> There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the blocker
>>>>> list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
>>>>> with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
>>>>> which has popped up only on ppc64el.
>>>>>
>>>>> #825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
>>>>> #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
>>>>> #825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
>>>>> #825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
>>>>> #837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky fix?
>>>>> #825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
>>>>> #834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed
>>>>
>>>> These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
>>>> DELAYED at the moment) and the other three blockers to be removed
>>>> from testing when the time comes. Thanks as ever to those who worked on
>>>> these issues.
>>>>
>>>> Release team, are we in a position to upload in the next day or two
>>>> or do we need to wait for a better time?
>>>
>>> I wanted to get openmpi done, and that's happened today. So, let's start this!
>>>
>> It actually only almost happened.  So maybe hold this for a bit.
> 
> Okay. Ready to upload when you say the word!

Britney crashed last night, but it just run and the openmpi issues are solved.
Go ahead!

Emilio


Reply to: