Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:12:12 +0200 with message-id <87a8f11jo3.fsf@lant.ki.iif.hu> and subject line Re: Bug#836370: transition: shibboleth has caused the Debian Bug report #836370, regarding transition: shibboleth to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 836370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836370 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: shibboleth
- From: Ferenc Wágner <wferi@niif.hu>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:28:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160902082808.9772.77534.reportbug@lant.ki.iif.hu>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition xmltooling 1.6, opensaml2 2.6 and shibboleth-sp2 2.6 each change their SONAME in this new version of this software stack. The new stack is already in experimental, and the two external depending packages (shibboleth-resolver and moonshot-gss-eap) build successfully against the new stack without any source change. The auto-xmltooling, auto-opensaml2 and auto-shibboleth-sp2 trackers look good, but here's a unified ben file: title = "shibboleth"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libxmltooling6v5" | .depends ~ "libsaml8v5" | .depends ~ "libshibsp6v5" | .depends ~ "libxmltooling7" | .depends ~ "libsaml9" | .depends ~ "libshibsp7"; is_good = .depends ~ "libxmltooling7" | .depends ~ "libsaml9" | .depends ~ "libshibsp7"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libxmltooling6v5" | .depends ~ "libsaml8v5" | .depends ~ "libshibsp6v5"; These packages will also be part of the openssl transition, but they are incompatible with OpenSSL-1.1. Upstream is already working on that on a separate branch. This internal SONAME transition, on the other hand, is very self-contained and should finish before that in my opinion.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 836370-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#836370: transition: shibboleth
- From: wferi@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner)
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:12:12 +0200
- Message-id: <87a8f11jo3.fsf@lant.ki.iif.hu>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] ea64eee9-7f6b-b759-20fd-b60e0e24df46@debian.org> (Emilio Pozuelo Monfort's message of "Mon, 5 Sep 2016 17:13:03 +0200")
- References: <[🔎] 20160902082808.9772.77534.reportbug@lant.ki.iif.hu> <[🔎] 6f09931f-9215-2cb7-0fba-f91d5ca3cc12@debian.org> <[🔎] 87h99xccg1.fsf@lant.ki.iif.hu> <[🔎] fabbec72-5d5a-421e-e6e9-68c0be79c0b3@debian.org> <[🔎] 8737lfd9zd.fsf@lant.ki.iif.hu> <[🔎] ea64eee9-7f6b-b759-20fd-b60e0e24df46@debian.org>
All packages migrated to stretch, let's close this. -- Thanks, Feri
--- End Message ---