[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#837469: marked as done (nmu: dose3_5.0.1-1)

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:20:00 +0200
with message-id <aa64b1a9-884e-aa21-a8fc-de1e1a668cf2@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#837469: nmu: dose3_5.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837469,
regarding nmu: dose3_5.0.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
837469: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837469
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu dose3_5.0.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild for camlzip 1.06-1"

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 14/09/16 06:23, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-09-14 00:47:01)
>> On 11/09/16 22:04, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: binnmu
>>>
>>> nmu dose3_5.0.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild for camlzip 1.06-1"
>>
>> Can you explain why this is needed? We don't like to blindly binNMU stuff, so
>> a little explanation is always helpful.
> 
> When src:dose3 (= 5.0.1-1) was originally built, it was built with src:camlzip
> (= 1.05-3) in the archive. This means that src:dose3 built libdose3-ocaml with
> a dependency on the virtual package libzip-ocaml-8wtm6 on amd64 which was
> provided by libzip-ocaml (= 1.05-3). Building the new src:camlzip release
> 1.06-1, replaced that libzip-ocaml package by a new version which now provides
> libzip-ocaml-4m8e9 on amd64. As a result, no package provides
> libzip-ocaml-8wtm6 anymore and libdose3-ocaml ocaml become uninstallable. You
> can verify this situation here:
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libdose3-ocaml (it says Package not available
> next to libzip-ocaml-8wtm6)
> 
> and here:
> 
> https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/unstable_main/1473742805/packages/libdose3-ocaml.html
> 
> The situation is analogous on all other architectures than amd64.
> 
> The situation arises because OCaml packages are statically linked and
> rebuilding a library requires a rebuild of all its reverse dependencies. I was
> told in #debian-ocaml that usually Stéphane Glondu would schedule OCaml binNMUs
> but he hasn't been on IRC for 3 days, so Mehdi Dogguy advised me to ask the
> release team to schedule the required binNMU of src:dose3.
> 
> One practical consequence of libdose3-ocaml not being installable right now is,
> that src:botch is currently bd-uninstallable:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=botch

Just a simple "camlzip is an ocaml package, which changes the ABI on every
release, thus needs a rebuild to pick up the updated dependency" would have been
enough ;)

I didn't realise this was ocaml related from the name.

Scheduled now.

And looks like somebody already scheduled it before me without closing this, so
it will be double fixed :P

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: