Re: Bug#837199: transition: armadillo

[Kumar Appaiah <a.kumar@alumni.iitm.ac.in>]

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:35:41AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse
> > dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and
> > will test it in the next couple of days.
> 
> Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unblock
> the vtk6 rebuild for the openmpi transition, I've also done a round of
> rebuilds to assess the impact.
> 
> Fortunately the number of reverse dependencies for armadillo is limited,
> and all packages rebuilt successfully:
> 
>  gdal     (2.1.1+dfsg-4) OK
>  gnss-sdr (0.0.8-1)      OK
>  mlpack   (2.0.2-1)      OK
>  seer     (1.1.1-2)      OK
> 
>  pktools  (2.6.7-2)      OK
> 
> I'd like to have gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) migrate to testing to get the two
> RC bugfixes into stretch, before binNMUs for the armadillo rdeps are
> scheduled.

Thanks. I've also verified that the packages build and work
well. Please let me know what to do to help and I'll be on it.

Thanks.

Kumar
-- 
On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a 'BREAK'
- everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS.
		-- Tarl Neustaedter