On 09/04/2016 07:30 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 22:18 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >>> Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need >>> to be binNMUs in stable for the following three packages: >>> >>> nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild against fixed dietlibc" >>> nmu mksh_50d-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild against fixed dietlibc" >>> nmu util-vserver_0.30.216-pre3054-1 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild against fixed dietlibc" >> >> Ok, that list got a bit shorter: Thorsten Glaser told me that while >> mksh Build-Depends on dietlibc-dev, it only uses it in sid onwards, >> so for Jessie there's no need to schedule a binNMU after the update >> to dietlibc for it. > > Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. No worries, it's still in time for the point release. :) > Please go ahead. Uploaded. >> So that would leave only util-vserver > > I'll schedule those after dietlibc has built everywhere. Thanks! >> and potentially minit, >> depending on whether you want to remove it or not. > > As previously mentioned, that's either a source upload or a removal, not > a binNMU. Yeah, sorry about not grokking that completely at the time. Regards, Christian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature