On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:41:08 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > [dropped #830267 from CC; it's not directly relevant to this branch of the > > discussion] So be it. [...] > > Does the BTS take account of entries in Sources marked > > "Extra-Source-Only: yes" when determining bugginess? > > No, we totally ignore that field. > > > If so, a possible explanation is that debsig-verify 0.15 migrated to > > testing overnight on the 18th/19th. The binary packages have > > "Built-Using: dpkg (= 1.18.9)", which would have led dak to add the > > corresponding source package to testing with an E-S-O marker. > > Ah. Yep, that definitely explains it. > > OK, this is going to take a bit of work; I think the short-term answer > is for the BTS to completely ignore source entries which are > Extra-Source-Only: yes > > I'll try to get to that shortly so we don't have more bad migrations > like this in the future. Thanks a lot, Adam, for figuring out what could be the cause of the bad migration. And thanks to you, Don, for your willingness to fix the issue soon. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpGRPtlwvlrR.pgp
Description: PGP signature