[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#829436: marked as done (nmu: ivtools_1.2.11a1-6)

Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2016 17:45:07 +0200
with message-id <c3b426355d9f1003a167d449b02542a6@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#829436: nmu: ivtools_1.2.11a1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #829436,
regarding nmu: ivtools_1.2.11a1-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
829436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

I finally fixed ace's FTBFS in kbsd, thus the rdeps needs to rebuild
against the newer lib, to be able to get rid of the old one.

The other rdep currently FTBFS; will try to fix and NMU.

nmu ivtools_1.2.11a1-6 . kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libace 6.3.3."

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2016-07-03 12:18, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:

nmu ivtools_1.2.11a1-6 . kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . unstable . -m
"Rebuild against libace 6.3.3."
As it didn't built on those arches anyway, you don't want a binNMU - it's a give-back, and for that you want the wanna-build list. But as I'd got that far in working out if the nmu was safe already, I've just done it this once. 

--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

--- End Message ---
Reply to: