Bug#828152: marked as done (transition: dwarfutils)
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2016 22:07:07 +0200
with message-id <a553056a-fa83-1f10-da57-c63f98d9b75b@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#828152: transition: dwarfutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #828152,
regarding transition: dwarfutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
828152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828152
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
I would like to update the libdwarf-dev package in unstable. The
current version is 20160613-1, the new version in experimental is
20160613-2.
The update will install the header files into /usr/include/libdwarf/
(instead of directly into /usr/include/). This will make the
libdwarf-dev package coinstallable with libdw-dev. Since both
libraries provide similar functionality, it can be expected that some
users might want to install both of them, which is not possible right
now.
hhvm, the only reverse build dependency of libdwarf-dev, builds fine
with the new version in experimental.
Build log for hhvm 3.12.1+dfsg-1 with libdwarf-dev 20160613-2:
https://bitbucket.org/snippets/f-w/7jEbM
Regards,
Fabian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=mioi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 25/06/16 15:10, Fabian Wolff wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I would like to update the libdwarf-dev package in unstable. The
> current version is 20160613-1, the new version in experimental is
> 20160613-2.
>
> The update will install the header files into /usr/include/libdwarf/
> (instead of directly into /usr/include/). This will make the
> libdwarf-dev package coinstallable with libdw-dev. Since both
> libraries provide similar functionality, it can be expected that some
> users might want to install both of them, which is not possible right
> now.
>
> hhvm, the only reverse build dependency of libdwarf-dev, builds fine
> with the new version in experimental.
Sure, go ahead. Not really a transition per se as the SONAME didn't change. I'm
closing this as there won't be any binNMUs needed and the package should migrate
without issues. Please let us know if that's wrong and you expect any further
action from us.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: