[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#827275: marked as done (release.debian.org: hint pixbros back into testing)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:09:42 +0200
with message-id <40912327-3f12-736e-3830-873061eb4946@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#827275: release.debian.org: hint pixbros back into testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #827275,
regarding release.debian.org: hint pixbros back into testing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
827275: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827275
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

pixbros was removed from testing due to an RC bug. I have fixed the RC
bug but it is not migrating back into testing because it is an arch all
package that depends on an 32-bit-only package (fenix) that has never
been available on amd64 but britney seems to want it on amd64:

    11 days old (needed 10 days)
    pixbros/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fenix
    pixbros/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fenix-plugins-system
    Not considered

-- 

bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 14/06/16 16:27, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> pixbros was removed from testing due to an RC bug. I have fixed the RC
> bug but it is not migrating back into testing because it is an arch all
> package that depends on an 32-bit-only package (fenix) that has never
> been available on amd64 but britney seems to want it on amd64:
> 
>     11 days old (needed 10 days)
>     pixbros/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fenix
>     pixbros/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fenix-plugins-system
>     Not considered

Given this is not a regression, I have hinted it. It should migrate in the next
britney run.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: