[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#827344: marked as done (nmu: sogo_2.2.17a-1.1)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:06:57 +0200
with message-id <5387f468-9b11-6329-5c9d-c65386653148@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#827344: nmu: sogo_2.2.17a-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #827344,
regarding nmu: sogo_2.2.17a-1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
827344: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827344
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

the binNMU there picked up libgnutls-deb0-28, so it needs another one.

nmu sogo_2.2.17a-1.1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libgnutls30"

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 15/06/16 09:27, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> the binNMU there picked up libgnutls-deb0-28, so it needs another one.
> 
> nmu sogo_2.2.17a-1.1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libgnutls30"

Scheduled.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: