Bug#815036: transition: msgpack-c
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 07:43:27PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 25/02/16 02:28, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:39:44PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 21/02/16 16:54, James McCoy wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:46:53PM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> >>>> FTBFS:
> >>>>
> >>>> * webdis:
> >>>> + #811343 filed with patch
No action seen on this. I can try to push this upstream. The package
hasn't seen any activity in almost a year (even with an upstream release
in the interim).
I could NMU this.
> >>>> * tmate:
> >>>> + New upstream version is needed
> >>>> + Will file a bug for this
> >>>
> >>> Filed #815381.
Fixed in experimental.
> >>>> * kumofs:
> >>>> + configure script expects the C++ library (libmsgpack) and therefore
> >>>> fails
> >>>> + Trivial patch to remove that expectation leads to a compile failure
> >>>> due to mixing code with C and C++ linkage
> >>>> + No upstream activity in 5+ years
> >>>> + Debian maintainer MIA
> >>>
> >>> Given the above and a popcon of 5, should an RM bug be filed?
> >>
> >> Yeah I'd say so.
> >
> > #815845 filed.
This has been removed from the archive.
libdata-messagepack-perl has an upstream pre-release which works with
the new msgpack-c. I've poked them to see if they're ready to make an
official release.
There's still been no reaction to my patch against
libdata-messagepack-stream-perl upstream. I can poke them again.
> How is this progressing?
To summarize:
+ Will NMU webdis with my proposed patch and send it upstream
+ tmate is fixed in experimental
+ libdata-messagepack-perl has a fix upstream but no "stable" release
including it
+ libdata-messagepack-stream-perl could be NMUed once
libdata-messagepack-perl is available.
Also, a new package has appeared in the interim which needs the new
msgpack-c.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
Reply to: