[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#821772: marked as done (transition: hunspell)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:40:56 +0200
with message-id <3940e552-b9b8-cc65-1b36-3de7297a636b@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#821772: transition: hunspell
has caused the Debian Bug report #821772,
regarding transition: hunspell
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
821772: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

new hunspell upstream release. As the time of this writing it hasn't cleared
NEW, though.

Upstream says:

--- snip ---
I bumped the soname because chunks of the exposed api were changed or           
deleted, but the part of the api used by anything outside of the                
hunspell utilities is unchanged and nearly everything in fedora at              
least rebuilds against it fine.                                                 
                                                                                
trivial fix for enchant:                                                        
  http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13772                           
trivial fix for libreoffice:                                                    
  https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/24218/  
--- snip ---

The enchant bug is filed as #821464.
For LibreOffice I'll take care myself for this tiny patch (or more likely
upload 5.1.3 rc1 which has it included)

Ben file:  
  
title = "hunspell";  
is_affected = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.3-0" | .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.4-0";  
is_good = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.4-0";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.3-0";

Ben will tell us but from looking in Packages I see the following source
packages affected:

aegisub
codelite
enchant
firefox
firefox-esr
focuswriter
goldendict
gwaei
hunspell
icedove
libreoffice
libtext-hunspell-perl
licq
lokalize
mudlet
onboard
plume-creator
pyhunspell
scribus
sigil
sonnet
tea
texstudio
texworks

I have a rebuild test of all those running right now.

Regards,

Rene

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: armhf (armv7l)

Kernel: Linux 3.18.0-trunk-rpi2 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 16/05/16 21:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/05/16 09:46, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:25:01AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>> k[...]
>>>> Go ahead.
>>>
>>> Thanks, uploaded.
>>
>> Now built everywhere. Could the binNMUs be scheduled?
>> (if you wait for something, no big deal either, though)
> 
> I was waiting for the rebuilds for other ongoing transitions to finish. These
> are now scheduled.

I removed the last rdep from testing. This is finished now.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: