After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running), We still have these package having problem: adasockets: build-dep problem apq: build-dep problem dbusada: build-dep problem dico: ftbfs dlz-ldap-enum: ftbfs gccxml: still building with gcc-4.9 !!!! geoclue: give up libalog: ftbfs libc++: clang not enable FPXX by default !!!! libcorelinux: ftbfs libdbusmenu: ftbfs libexplain: ftbfs libflorist: build-dep problem libgnatcoll: build-dep problem libgtkada: build-dep problem libhtp: give up liblog4ada: build-dep problem libncursesada: build-dep problem libvisca: ftbfs libxkbcommon: ftbfs libxmlezout: ftbfs linbox: ftbfs lua-discount: ftbfs mozjs24: build-dep problem osptoolkit: ftbfs pcscada: build-dep problem polyorb: build-dep problem Non of the above packages make big problems for the next step, So that I think we can start rebuilding the other non-fpxx package. The attachment is the list --- more than 3000 packages. Sorry for the previous wrong estimation. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote: > On 01/06/16 11:27, YunQiang Su wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote: >>> On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote: >>>> Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9. >>> >>> Is gcc-snapshot needed? >> >> It is not needed. Sorry forget to exclude it. >> >>> >>> BTW are these the ones with affected static libraries, or all of them? Per your >>> email, we should do the packages with static libraries first, and only then do >>> the rest, IIUC. >>> >> >> These are all about static libraries, aka some static libraries from >> them are still not >> fpxx-enabled. >> >>> If that's too cumbersome to find, we can do all now and then rebuild the ones >>> that are still using the old ABI because of static linking. Those shouldn't be >>> too many anyway as we don't use static linking much. >> >> It is not difficult to detect static libraries. > > OK. I have scheduled them all, with a lower priority so other uploads can be > built as well. > > There were some problems though: > > W: can't get version info for firedns/mips > W: can't get version info for firedns/mipsel > W: can't get version info for geoclue/mips > W: can't get version info for geoclue/mipsel > W: can't get version info for libhtp/mips > W: can't get version info for libhtp/mipsel > > Are those the right package names? For geoclue you may have meant geoclue-2. > src:geoclue is no longer in unstable/testing. > > Cheers, > Emilio -- YunQiang Su
Attachment:
mipsel.source
Description: Binary data