Bug#818666: marked as done (transition: pypy)
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 09:19:16 +0200
with message-id <5742AEF4.2060808@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#818666: transition: pypy
has caused the Debian Bug report #818666,
regarding transition: pypy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
818666: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: pypy
- From: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:06:34 +0100
- Message-id: <20160319140634.31415.6336.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
looks like pypy 5.0 started a transition, the virtual package
pypy-abi-26 changed to pypy-abi-41. There are some uninstallable
rdepends now: pypy-dulwich, pypy-zmq.
Maybe it's sufficient to just binNMU them (but I didn't test this):
nmu dulwich_0.12.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against pypy 5.0"
nmu pyzmq_15.1.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against pypy 5.0"
Ben file:
title = "pypy";
is_affected = .depends ~ /pypy-abi/;
is_good = .depends ~ "pypy-abi-41";
is_bad = .depends ~ "pypy-abi-26";
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>, 818666-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#818666: transition: pypy
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:19:16 +0200
- Message-id: <5742AEF4.2060808@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <e66e81fc09b19f29574f95f2a17effd3@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
- References: <20160319140634.31415.6336.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de> <56EDE699.6010101@debian.org> <e66e81fc09b19f29574f95f2a17effd3@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
On 03/04/16 13:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On 2016-03-19 23:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 19/03/16 15:06, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> looks like pypy 5.0 started a transition, the virtual package
>>> pypy-abi-26 changed to pypy-abi-41. There are some uninstallable
>>> rdepends now: pypy-dulwich, pypy-zmq.
>>>
>>> Maybe it's sufficient to just binNMU them (but I didn't test this):
>>>
>>> nmu dulwich_0.12.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against pypy 5.0"
>>> nmu pyzmq_15.1.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against pypy 5.0"
>>
>> pypy needs to build on every release architecture first...
>
> It's now built, let's find out if things can binNMU...
That took a long time, but it's now done.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: