[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#823872: marked as done (nmu: aster_11.5.0+dfsg2-4)



Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2016 13:55:41 +0200
with message-id <5731CC3D.1040409@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#823872: nmu: aster_11.5.0+dfsg2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #823872,
regarding nmu: aster_11.5.0+dfsg2-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi

It seems petsc was transitioned on the quiet.
Fortunately, its other reverse-deps; slepc, dolfin and getdp have all
had sourceful uploads and only aster needs a binNMU.

Regards
Graham

nmu aster_11.5.0+dfsg2-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against petsc 3.6.3'

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/05/16 22:52, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> Hi
> 
> It seems petsc was transitioned on the quiet.
> Fortunately, its other reverse-deps; slepc, dolfin and getdp have all
> had sourceful uploads and only aster needs a binNMU.
> 
> Regards
> Graham
> 
> nmu aster_11.5.0+dfsg2-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against petsc 3.6.3'

Scheduled.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: