Bug#823034: transition: rrdtool
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 30/04/16 10:21, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-rrdtool-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Hello dear release team
>
> rrdtool bumped its soname for 4 to 8 in version 1.6. The library is now
> thead safe, so that librrd_th.so is gone. Regular librrd.so should be
> used whether thread safety is required or not.
> Inside this library, the symbol removal does not affect any of Debian
> architectures. Only non-posix ones are impacted.
>
> rrdtool version 1.6 is now in experimental. The "auto-rrdtool
> transition" [1] lists the 10 packages that will need to be bin-nmu'd:
>
> title = "rrdtool";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "librrd4" | .depends ~ "librrd8";
> is_good = .depends ~ "librrd8";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "librrd4";
>
> Library packages are co-installable.
>
> All 8 packages that built from source still do with version 1.6. I don't
> expect any trouble.
> The only bug I could find is about collectd, currently FTBFS, that will
> display a bogus message during compilation, and will performed
> its own mutex locking at runtime. See #823012 and #822397.
>
> Please tell me when it's ok to upload to unstable.
Go ahead.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: