Bug#821440: marked as done (transition: ntfs-3g)

[owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)]

Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 09:14:20 +0200
with message-id <5726FE4C.2040703@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#821440: transition: ntfs-3g
has caused the Debian Bug report #821440,
regarding transition: ntfs-3g
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
821440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
• Subject: transition: ntfs-3g
• From: "Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)" <gcs@debian.org>
• Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:01:09 +0200
• Message-id: <1461002469.23222.9.camel@debian.org>

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

ntfs-3g previously used a virtual library[1] that caused problems with
packages depending on it. I've created a normal, binNMU safe library
package which currently sits in experimental.
Tested the affected packages:
- partclone
- testdisk
- wimlib

All three build fine and seem to be correct with the new ntfs-3g
package. May I upload the it with the new upstream release to Sid?
Mentioned packages will need to be binNMUed.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798888

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org>
• Cc: 821440-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Bug#821440: transition: ntfs-3g
• From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
• Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 09:14:20 +0200
• Message-id: <5726FE4C.2040703@debian.org>
• In-reply-to: <CAKjSHr2htdrKxZg5v5DSXqsZVzPUJk_BXushMeveOXXxcKBF0w@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <1461002469.23222.9.camel@debian.org> <57152CDF.6040802@debian.org> <CAKjSHr2htdrKxZg5v5DSXqsZVzPUJk_BXushMeveOXXxcKBF0w@mail.gmail.com>

On 20/04/16 08:05, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 18/04/16 20:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>>> All three build fine and seem to be correct with the new ntfs-3g
>>> package. May I upload the it with the new upstream release to Sid?
>>> Mentioned packages will need to be binNMUed.
>>
>> Sure, go ahead.
>  Uploaded and built on all primary architectures. Fails on kFreeBSD
> ones due to a non-existing (Linux only) errno on them, working on it.
> You can issue the binNMUs.

This just migrated last night.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---