Bug#822531: marked as done (nmu: swftools_0.9.2+git20130725-4)
Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:40:25 +0200
with message-id <571DBBD9.2080703@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#822531: nmu: swftools_0.9.2+git20130725-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #822531,
regarding nmu: swftools_0.9.2+git20130725-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
822531: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822531
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
swftools correctly build-depends on libjpeg-dev, but the amd64 version
(coming from the binary upload by the maintainer) depends on libjpeg8.
Rebuilding in a clean up-to-date environment should fix this.
@Christian Welzel: you are CC'ed because you are the maintainer of
swftools, although there is no action required on your side.
In future uploads, either do source-only uploads (preferred), or at
least upload binaries built in a clean and up-to-date unstable chroot
(e.g. with pbuilder/sbuild/etc).
nmu swftools_0.9.2+git20130725-4 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in clean environment"
Thanks,
--
Pino
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 25/04/16 08:33, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> swftools correctly build-depends on libjpeg-dev, but the amd64 version
> (coming from the binary upload by the maintainer) depends on libjpeg8.
> Rebuilding in a clean up-to-date environment should fix this.
>
> @Christian Welzel: you are CC'ed because you are the maintainer of
> swftools, although there is no action required on your side.
> In future uploads, either do source-only uploads (preferred), or at
> least upload binaries built in a clean and up-to-date unstable chroot
> (e.g. with pbuilder/sbuild/etc).
>
> nmu swftools_0.9.2+git20130725-4 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in clean environment"
Scheduled.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: