[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810597: marked as done (transition: gnutls28)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:03:55 +0200
with message-id <570DFD6B.1040003@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#810597: transition: gnutls28
has caused the Debian Bug report #810597,
regarding transition: gnutls28
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
810597: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

I'd like to finally upgrade GnuTLS in sid to 3.4. It has been declared
stable on Nov 29th 2015
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/8360>.

There is a soname bump for the main library package, but the
development package name is unchanged, i.e. the transition is
binNMU-able.

Afaik [1] we are now ready for the transition. 4 packages are known to
FTBFS:
* dsyslog: Not in testing.
* pacemaker-mgmt: Not in testing.
* libaws: This should be fixed upstream, but would not be a blocker
  since it is a leaf package.
* libimobiledevice: There is a patch. And I even had fixed this in
  experimental but the maintainers have dropped the fix again in a
  following upload.

Ben file:

title = "gnutls28";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgnutls-deb0-28" | .depends ~ "libgnutls30";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgnutls30";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgnutls-deb0-28";

cu Andreas

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=gnutls34;users=ametzler@debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 21/01/16 11:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 10/01/16 11:32, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to finally upgrade GnuTLS in sid to 3.4. It has been declared
>> stable on Nov 29th 2015
>> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/8360>.
>>
>> There is a soname bump for the main library package, but the
>> development package name is unchanged, i.e. the transition is
>> binNMU-able.
>>
>> Afaik [1] we are now ready for the transition. 4 packages are known to
>> FTBFS:
>> * dsyslog: Not in testing.
>> * pacemaker-mgmt: Not in testing.
>> * libaws: This should be fixed upstream, but would not be a blocker
>>   since it is a leaf package.
>> * libimobiledevice: There is a patch. And I even had fixed this in
>>   experimental but the maintainers have dropped the fix again in a
>>   following upload.
> 
> Now that the python3 transition is done, you can go ahead.

The old libs just got removed from testing. Let's close this.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: