[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801317: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb7u1)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:22:42 +0100
with message-id <1459603362.2441.217.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Fix included in oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #801317,
regarding wheezy-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
801317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

please consider postgresql-9.1/9.1.19-0+deb7u1 for the next wheezy
point release:

postgresql-9.1 (9.1.19-0+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version.

    + Fix contrib/pgcrypto to detect and report too-short crypt() salts
      (Josh Kupershmidt)

      Certain invalid salt arguments crashed the server or disclosed a few
      bytes of server memory.  We have not ruled out the viability of attacks
      that arrange for presence of confidential information in the disclosed
      bytes, but they seem unlikely.  (CVE-2015-5288)

 -- Christoph Berg <christoph.berg@credativ.de>  Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:30:41 +0200

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 7.10

Hi,

The updates referenced in these bugs were included in today's wheezy
point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: