--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: jessie-pu: package fonts-sil-andika/1.004-2+deb8u1
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 07:36:21 +0100
- Message-id: <2flfuw6lpga.fsf@diskless.uio.no>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
When the font-sil-andika package is installed in Jessie, the fontconfig
library print out these warnings for all X programs using fontconfig:
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 16: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
The package is a reverse dependency of tuxtype and
task-hungarian-desktop, and installed by default on Debian Edu.
The cause is an incorrect removal of a obsolete conffile in version
1.004-2. The fix was uploaded to unstable in version 5.000-1, and I
propose to include it in stable too. The attached patch show the
changes. Is this OK to upload to stable?
This is with the approval of the package maintainres, see
<URL: https://bugs.debian.org/687172 >.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0e319e6..9271605 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+fonts-sil-andika (1.004-2+deb8u1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Backport fix from unstable.
+ * really remove 65-andika.conf, Closes: #768232
+ delete d/links with useless symlink
+ d/maintscript to remove 65-andika.conf
+
+ -- Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org> Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:37:43 +0100
+
fonts-sil-andika (1.004-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Drop the now useless 65-andika.conf fontconfig file
diff --git a/debian/links b/debian/links
deleted file mode 100644
index afe457e..0000000
--- a/debian/links
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-andika.conf etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf
diff --git a/debian/maintscript b/debian/maintscript
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0a5f689
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/maintscript
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+rm_conffile /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-andika.conf 1.004-2~ fonts-sil-andika
--- End Message ---