[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#817184: marked as done (transition: sndio)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:05:13 +0100
with message-id <56ED4079.40507@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#817184: transition: sndio
has caused the Debian Bug report #817184,
regarding transition: sndio
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
817184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817184
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

libsndio has undergone a minor SONAME bump in the latest release; there is however no consequential change in the public API that I'm aware of. The updated package is already in experimental, and all rdeps still build. There should be no action necessary for rdeps other than a rebuild.

There are two rdeps in common with libcdio, which also has a transition staged in experimental; there is no reason libsndio shouldn't wait a while if that makes things easier. At least one rdep would like to wait to fix an RC bug anyway.

For reference, reverse-dependencies of libsndio6.0 in unstable are:

 * sndiod, sndio-tools: Same source package as libsndio6.0, non-issue
 * libsdl2: maintainers would like to fix an RC bug first rather than binNMU
 * mpv, audacious-plugins: should need only a rebuild

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 09/03/16 12:49, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

Hi




Please go ahead.


done a few seconds ago.


and this is over.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: