On 03/12/2016 06:25 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 18:23 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2016-03-12): >>> On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 11:16 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 11:19 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >>> [...] >>>>> I'd like to update flash-kernel in jessie with the below debdiff. The >>>>> intention is to fix the critical bug #813995. The two other changes are >>>>> just prerequisites for it. These changes are in unstable since >>>>> flash-kernel 3.59. >>>> >>>> FWIW as one of the more recently active flash-kernel maintainers I am >>>> in favour of this, since flash-kernel is run as part of the installer >>>> simply adding the lastest f-k with the fix to jessie-backports is not >>>> sufficient. >>> >>> The diff looks okay to me, but as it affects d-i a KiBi-ack would be >>> preferable for completeness. >> >> This approach looks good to me, kibi-ack. > > Thanks. Uwe / Ian, please feel free to upload. I uploaded the package that I created the debdiff with. i.e. no +nmu even though I'm not part of the Debian Install System Team. (That's what Ian suggested.) That means I didn't close this bug (#817897) with the changelog. This is my first stable update, so I don't know the protocol and didn't find it in the docs. Am I supposed to close this, or does someone else (for example when accepting the package)? Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature