[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#817075: marked as done (transition: tesseract)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:46:37 -0800
with message-id <CAHjiUboo+ZNjgC4fm5ZwDuvoH+EWtGzYt1trc3TfP3T8WXYXSw@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #817075,
regarding transition: tesseract
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
817075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817075
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Subject: transition: tesseract-ocr
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal

As described in bug #815056, there was a packaging mistake that led to
the brief existance of libtesseract4. This problem has been corrected
and we are now back to libtesseract3.  I was advised in the Debian Devel
IRC channel to file this transition bug, asking to rebuild
dependencies. I believe the latest Tesseract packages will not enter
Debian Testing without this assistance.

Ben file:

title = "tesseract-ocr";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libtesseract4" | .depends ~ "libtesseract3";
is_good = .depends ~ "libtesseract3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libtesseract4";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-76-generic
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
closing because this is a duplicate of bug #815919

--- End Message ---
Reply to: