Bug#816697: jessie-pu: package fonts-sil-andika/1.004-2+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 18:45 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 07:36 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > When the font-sil-andika package is installed in Jessie, the fontconfig
> > library print out these warnings for all X programs using fontconfig:
> >
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 16: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf", line 35: Having multiple <family> in <alias> isn't supported and may not work as expected
> >
> > The package is a reverse dependency of tuxtype and
> > task-hungarian-desktop, and installed by default on Debian Edu.
> >
> > The cause is an incorrect removal of a obsolete conffile in version
> > 1.004-2. The fix was uploaded to unstable in version 5.000-1, and I
> > propose to include it in stable too. The attached patch show the
> > changes. Is this OK to upload to stable?
>
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: