[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813532: marked as done (transition: libjsoncpp)

Your message dated Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:51:19 +0100
with message-id <56D94C87.30902@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#813532: transition: libjsoncpp
has caused the Debian Bug report #813532,
regarding transition: libjsoncpp
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
813532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813532
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I would like to start the transition for libjsoncpp.

Its been on experimental for quite a while now, until I could test all the
rdepends.

The following rdepends have been successfully tested:

cmake
bamtools
dcmtkpp
kodi-pvr-argustv
lgogdownloader
libjson-rpc-cpp
llvm-toolchain-3.7
minetest
orthanc
paraview
springlobby
sysdig
vtk6

The following rdepends have a FTBFS problem:

ginkgocadx - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805170

Ben file:

title = "libjsoncpp";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libjsoncpp0v5" | .depends ~ "libjsoncpp1";
is_good = .depends ~ "libjsoncpp1";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libjsoncpp0v5";



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 10/02/16 19:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 10/02/16 19:26, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Yes there is already a bug for that:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813939
>>
>> I didn't want to interfere with the transition. Can I just upload a new
>> version of the package which has the conflicts/replaces removed, without
>> disturbing the transition?
> 
> Yes. Given the transition is currently stalled, that won't be a problem. Please
> go ahead.

The old binaries just got removed from testing, so this is over. Closing.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: