Bug#813100: marked as done (transition: libopenobex)
Your message dated Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:01:43 +0100
with message-id <56D7FD77.6070708@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#813100: transition: libopenobex
has caused the Debian Bug report #813100,
regarding transition: libopenobex
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
813100: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813100
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: libopenobex
- From: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:15:36 +0100
- Message-id: <20160129131536.24996.99360.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libopenobex.html
Control: block -1 with 811054 810562 811300 810521 810331 810773
An uncoordinated transition was started when libopenobex1 was uploaded
with a new SONAME, but without renaming the package. The library has
now been adopted by Nobuhiro and renamed packages were uploaded.
All rdepends need sourceful uploads to switch from libopenobex1-dev to
the virtual package libopenobex-dev.
Many rdepends already have FTBFS bugs with the new version (and those
that don't, may not have been tested, yet).
Removal of libopenobex1-dev will cause these problems:
# Broken Depends:
libsyncml: libsyncml-dev [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x]
obexftp: libobexftp0-dev [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x]
# Broken Build-Depends:
ircp-tray: libopenobex1-dev
libsyncml: libopenobex1-dev (>= 1.2)
obex-data-server: libopenobex1-dev (>= 1.3)
obexftp: libopenobex1-dev (>= 1.3-3)
obexpushd: libopenobex1-dev
python-lightblue: libopenobex1-dev
syncevolution: libopenobex1-dev
ussp-push: libopenobex1-dev
Ben file:
the autogenerated one looks fine
@Nobuhiro: Please file RC bugs against the affected packages (or reuse
the existing FTBFS bugs) and make them block this transition bug.
To ease future transitions, the packages should switch to the virtual
package libopenobex-dev instead of libopenobex2-dev.
Thanks
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>, 813100-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#813100: transition: libopenobex
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:01:43 +0100
- Message-id: <56D7FD77.6070708@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20160129131536.24996.99360.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
- References: <20160129131536.24996.99360.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
On 29/01/16 14:15, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libopenobex.html
> Control: block -1 with 811054 810562 811300 810521 810331 810773
>
> An uncoordinated transition was started when libopenobex1 was uploaded
> with a new SONAME, but without renaming the package. The library has
> now been adopted by Nobuhiro and renamed packages were uploaded.
This is over now.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: