Bug#816428: nmu: hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1

[Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de>]

On 2016-03-01 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> On 01/03/16 20:25, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libvigraimpex6"
>> nmu enblend-enfuse_4.1.4+dfsg-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libvigraimpex6"
 
>> both hugin and enblend-enfuse were built (or binmued) against a broken
>> version of libvigraimpex which shipped libvigraimpex.so.6 in a package
>> still named libvigraimpex5v5. (#813415)

> I haven't scheduled the appropriate binNMUs yet because libvigraimpex isn't
> built everywhere.

Hello,

I am aware of the transition, which is why I have waited two weeks
before requesting the binNMU. However hugin and enblend-enfuse are only
broken on the archs where libvigraimpex does build.

So a straight rebuild would fix this serious bug, at the imho small cost
that a later followup binNMU might be needed when libvigraimpex is
ready.

Thanks in advance for considering,
cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'