[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#808521: marked as done (transition: mpich)



Your message dated Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:23:00 +0100
with message-id <56D089F4.3080404@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#808521: transition: mpich
has caused the Debian Bug report #808521,
regarding transition: mpich
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
808521: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808521
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition


Dear release team,

it seems my new upload of mpich, which removed old libmpl1 and libopa1
libraries requires transition at least on s390x.


Ben file:

title = "mpich";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libmpl1" | .depends ~ "libmpich12" | .depends ~ "libopa1";
is_good = .depends ~ "libmpich12";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libmpl1" | .depends ~ "libopa1";


Thanks and sorry for uncoordinated transition

Anton

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 16/01/16 11:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 16/01/16 10:05, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Hi Emilio,
>>
>> 2016-01-09 12:07 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
>>>
>>> netpipe-mpich2 depends on mpich2
>>>
>>
>> Fixed (NMUed).
>>
>>
>>> espresso/s390x failed to build
>>>
>>
>> Fixed in package elpa, could you please schedule espresso_s390x
> 
> Done.
> 
>> and check, whether we can finish this transition?
> 
> Will do.

This seems to be over. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: