[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#782596: marked as done (RFC: possible wheezy-pu: package debhelper to address #708218 for wheezy?)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:11:23 +0000
with message-id <20160221111123.GV6200@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#782596: RFC: possible wheezy-pu: package debhelper to address #708218 for wheezy?
has caused the Debian Bug report #782596,
regarding RFC: possible wheezy-pu: package debhelper to address #708218 for wheezy?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
782596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi Stable release managers,

This is not a wheezy-pu request per se. The recent libxrender update
through security.d.o was initially just a rebuild of libxrender
against a fixed version of libx11. This caused #782505 ("libxrender1:
dist-upgrade breaks on multiarch due to conflict on
changelog.Debian.gz").

The fix for debhelper in #708218 didn't make it into wheezy so binNMUs
in wheezy for multiarch enabled packages will have the problem.

Would it make sense to have an update of debhelper in wheezy fixing
this issue as well?

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 22:21:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 23:09 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > On 2015-04-14 17:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> [...]
> > > The fix for debhelper in #708218 didn't make it into wheezy so binNMUs
> > > in wheezy for multiarch enabled packages will have the problem.
> > > 
> > > Would it make sense to have an update of debhelper in wheezy fixing
> > > this issue as well?
> [...]
> > >From a debhelper PoV, it looks reasonable at first glance.
> > 
> > It looks like we would need to backport the 4 commits listed in the
> > attached "...-commits.diff" file.  The combined result (excluding
> > changelog entries) is in the "...-dh_installchangelogs.diff" and had no
> > merge conflicts (only one chunk required fuzziness to be applied).
> 
> The diff looks okay to me, but...
> 
> > Except a missing changelog entry, is the expected debdiff for such an
> > upload.  Disclaimer, not tested (not even build tested).
> 
> ... that needs addressing before we can consider an upload. :)
> 
No followup since last April.  Closing now.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: