[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#731735: marked as done (pu: package glance/2012.1.1-5+deb7u1)



Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:47:03 +0000
with message-id <20160221104703.GJ6200@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#731735: pu: package glance/2012.1.1-5+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731735,
regarding pu: package glance/2012.1.1-5+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
731735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

I have prepared an update for Glance over here:
http://archive.gplhost.com/pub/security/glance/

Attached to this mail is the relevant debdiff for Glance.
What the update does is only fixing the logrotate path,
which is currently wrong in the current Wheezy version.
Here's the changelog:

[ Thomas Goirand ]
* debian/gbp.conf now tracking the debian/wheezy branch.
[ Julien Cristau ]
* Fix logrotate config to reference the right file names.

Thanks considering this and letting me know,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog	2013-03-14 20:53:41.000000000 +0000
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog	2013-12-09 07:48:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+glance (2012.1.1-5+deb7u1) wheezy-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  [ Thomas Goirand ]
+  * debian/gbp.conf now tracking the debian/wheezy branch.
+
+  [ Julien Cristau ]
+  * Fix logrotate config to reference the right file names.
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>  Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:44:43 +0800
+
 glance (2012.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * CVE-2013-1840: fixes "Backend credentials leak in Glance v1 API"
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf	2013-03-14 20:53:41.000000000 +0000
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf	2013-12-09 07:48:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [DEFAULT]
 upstream-branch = master
-debian-branch = debian/unstable
+debian-branch = debian/wheezy
 upstream-tag = %(version)s
 compression = xz
 
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate	2013-03-14 20:53:41.000000000 +0000
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate	2013-12-09 07:48:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/var/log/glance/glance-api.log {
+/var/log/glance/api.log {
     daily
     missingok
     compress
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate	2013-03-14 20:53:41.000000000 +0000
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate	2013-12-09 07:48:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/var/log/glance/glance-registry.log {
+/var/log/glance/registry.log {
     daily
     missingok
     compress

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:47:40 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On 2014-08-24 19:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >On 2014-01-22 21:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:12 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >>>> I have prepared an update for Glance over here:
> >>>> http://archive.gplhost.com/pub/security/glance/
> >>>
> >>>The security tracker lists this issue as potentially open in
> >>>Wheezy: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-4354
> >>>
> >>>Does this affect stable and is there a fix which can be included
> >>>along?
> >>
> >>Ping? (On both the original upload and Moritz's question.)
> >
> >Re-ping.
> 
> Re-re-ping.
> 
> If nothing happens with this soon then I'm tempted to close the request,
> rather than leaving it open indefinitely.
> 
That was over a year ago; closing.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---

Reply to: