[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810568: transition: openexr



Hi Emilio!

On 2016-01-27 at 11:25 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries?

Now I can say "Yes, they do" ;-)

The only missing piece is aqsis, which can be NMUed easily if its
maintainer doesn't reply to our request for an updated revision using
the patch applied in ArchLinux (that fixes the problem with OpenEXR
2.x) in time for the transition start.
I've already tested it both in unstable[1] (built against actual
ilmbase/openexr packages in unstable/sid) and experimental[2] (built
against these brand new ilmbase/openexr 2.2.0).

So, do you think it can be a good time now to start this long-awaited
transition?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers.

[1] http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/aqsis/1.8.2-2.1/
[2] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#experimental/aqsis/1.8.2-2.1/

-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: