[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#812338: marked as done (nmu: staden_2.0.0+b10-1.1)



Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:12:36 +0100
with message-id <56A79AF4.2040700@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#812338: nmu: staden_2.0.0+b10-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #812338,
regarding nmu: staden_2.0.0+b10-1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
812338: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812338
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu staden_2.0.0+b10-1.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libstaden-read11"

src:staden-io-lib started a mini-transition (affecting 2 rdepends) from
libstaden-read1 to libstaden-read11 quite some time ago.
Now let's finally rebuild the forgotten rdepends: staden (which is only
in sid). (The other one, libbio-scf-perl, already got rebuilt for the
perl transition.)


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 22/01/16 15:22, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu staden_2.0.0+b10-1.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libstaden-read11"
> 
> src:staden-io-lib started a mini-transition (affecting 2 rdepends) from
> libstaden-read1 to libstaden-read11 quite some time ago.
> Now let's finally rebuild the forgotten rdepends: staden (which is only
> in sid). (The other one, libbio-scf-perl, already got rebuilt for the
> perl transition.)

Scheduled.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: