[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#811362: marked as done (nmu: libimobiledevice_1.2.0+dfsg-2)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:29:45 +0000
with message-id <73254e63deb4e30109cd21e38ecd7f9d@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#811362: nmu: libimobiledevice_1.2.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #811362,
regarding nmu: libimobiledevice_1.2.0+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
811362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811362
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libimobiledevice_1.2.0+dfsg-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libusbmuxd4"

libusbmuxd4 is seeing a very small (1 rdep) uncoordinated transition.
It has been uploaded to unstable, and the very same day libimobiledevice
has been, but they raced toghether (e.g. the uploader did not wait for
usbmuxd4 to be available).

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2016-01-18 10:23, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:

Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libimobiledevice_1.2.0+dfsg-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild
against libusbmuxd4"

libusbmuxd4 is seeing a very small (1 rdep) uncoordinated transition.
It has been uploaded to unstable, and the very same day libimobiledevice 
has been, but they raced toghether (e.g. the uploader did not wait for
usbmuxd4 to be available).
That's not accurate. libimobiledevice has built against libusbmuxd4 on arm64 at least, I haven't checked other architectures.
Andreas is correct that the versions need to be kept in sync though, and the amd64 build is wrong, so scheduling for ANY. Let's review what ben thinks when that is done. 


--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

--- End Message ---
Reply to: