[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810011: marked as done (nmu: Please try building kodi-pvr-hts again)



Your message dated Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:56:56 +0000
with message-id <1452020216.2006.77.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#810011: nmu: Please try building kodi-pvr-hts again
has caused the Debian Bug report #810011,
regarding nmu: Please try building kodi-pvr-hts again
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
810011: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810011
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

I have updated libcec-platform which is a transitive build-dependency
of kodi-pvr-hts and now kodi-pvr-hts builds fine on mipsel.

Please trigger a rebuild to have official builds for the package.

 gb kodi-pvr-hts . mips mipsel mips64el

Thanks,
Balint

PS: Is there any automatism to try building packages with updated
transitive build-dependencies?

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 15:50 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
[...]
> Please trigger a rebuild to have official builds for the package.
> 
>  gb kodi-pvr-hts . mips mipsel mips64el

That's not a binNMU, it's a give-back - hence "gb". Please don't use
binNMU requests for wanna-build actions that aren't binNMUs - other
actions should be directed to $arch@buildd.d.o or
debian-wb-team@lists.d.o, as per
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/03/msg00096.html

Given back in any case.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: